In electronics system, you had experiences with programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and localized embedded systems. You can achieve significant cost reduction by replacing PLCs with localized embedded systems. where a PLC, the more expensive option, is the better choice.
1.PLCs and their applications:
A programmable logic controller is a specialized industrial computer. It is custom programmed to monitor input signals (digital or analog), perform logical operations, and trigger specific output signals. PLCs are known to be rugged and are commonly used in extreme industrial environments or applications that have almost no room for failure.
PLCs are popular because of their modular structure. This makes them easy to install in a plug-and-play manner. At their most basic, they consist of a central processing unit (CPU), a power supply and input/output (I/O) modules. Programming PLCs is less complicated than coding a microcontroller. This is because it revolves around ladder diagram, functional block diagram, and structured text on software provided by the manufacturers.
PLCs are not strangers to industrial applications. They are commonly used in production lines, road traffic signals, escalator and HVAC systems. They’re capable of basic data manipulation and support various communication protocols like Modbus, and DeviceNet. This has made them a preferred option in automated control systems.
PLC installation is mostly plug-and-play.
Why Localized Embedded Systems Are Sometimes Replacing PLCs
In general, an embedded system is defined as a dedicated set of hardware and software working together to provide application-specific functionality. From an electronic designer’s point of view, it consists of a microcontroller (MCU), memory chips, power management circuits, communication modules and input/output functionality.This might sound similar to a PLC, but there are distinct differences between them.
Configuration: PLCs are known to be modular and easily replaceable if a specific module fails. On the other hand, embedded systems are mostly designed as a single board. This reduces their cost.
Programming: PLC programming is generally less time consuming since they come with easy to understand ladder diagrams. However, embedded systems are coded in high-level programming languages, like C, and their firmware takes longer to write.
Cost: PLCs are associated with having a high cost, especially when they are from reputable manufacturers. Alternatively, an embedded system, when localized, has a very low production cost per unit.
Despite the differences in hardware build-ups and programming methods, an embedded system can easily replicate a PLC’s functions. This was for one reason only, cost. In certain applications, a localized embedded system can cost as little as 20% of a branded PLC. In business, that translates into a healthy profit margin while still achieving the same functionality.
Technical support is critical regardless of whether you choose a PLC or an embedded system
When To Use PLC Despite The Higher Cost Per Unit?
You might be wondering why we aren’t all switching over to embedded systems. Cost is always a consideration, but it is a mistake to automatically prefer a localized embedded system for cost alone. There are times when it is best to stick with using a PLC despite the fact that it can significantly increase your expenses. Here are some factors that make the cost of PLCs worthwhile.
Volume: Unless you’re working on a project that requires hundreds of PLCs with the same setup, it can be more cost effective to purchase a commercial off the shelf PLC. The costs in time of developing a localized embedded system and manufacturing its setup might not be worthwhile.
Certification: In certain industrial applications, there are requirements for the electronics control system to be certified by standard organizations. Branded PLCs usually came with CE, UL and other certifications. If the cost of certifying your own embedded system outweighs the cost of the PLC, then it’s better to stick with the latter option.
Support: PLCs often come with support from a reputable company. If you’re outsourcing the manufacturing of your localized embedded system to a contractor, make sure that you’ll receive a decent amount of technical support. Otherwise it’s better to stay safe with PLC.
Reliability: If your intended application involves your control systems operating in harsh electrical and physical environments, it is often better to go with a PLC that is already proven to work in these environments. Unless you’re set on developing localized embedded systems for these conditions and have budgeted to do so, there’s a good chance that they won’t have sufficient lab testing.